Power, Terror, Peace, and War: America's Grand Strategy in a World at Risk FROM THE PUBLISHER
From one of our most brilliant and original writers on U.S. foreign policy, a stunning and timely book on the policy of the Bush administration and its current grand strategy for the world.
Mead begins by analyzing America's historical approach to the worldby no means perfect, but reasonably moral and reasonably practical on the whole. Then he examines the explosive foreign policy of the Bush administration and the uproar it has caused at home and abroad. Bush, according to Mead, is often strategically right but tactically at fault in his attempts to lead a divided nationand a divided coalition of alliesin a dangerous struggle against ruthless enemies.
We see how the mass terror attacks of 2001 have changed the political and strategic problems of American foreign policy. Despair and decay in the Arab world now present America and its allies with an extraordinarily difficult challenge. The accelerating collapse of civilized life in broad reaches of Africaand the looming disasters of a similar kind in Central Asiathreatens to create lawless, violent zones where terrorism can thrive, and weapons of mass destruction and biological and chemical weapons can proliferate.
We learn why key American alliances have frayed and why the Bush administration's pronouncements and actions have ignited the most acrimonious U.S. political battles over foreign policy since the Vietnam War. Mead closes with a rigorous assessment of both Bush and his critics, and describes the urgent steps the United States must take lest casualties in the war on terror mount and the war itself spin out of control. He proposes a new approach to the war that can rebuilddomestic and international support for a tough antiterror policy, outlines a new initiative for the Israeli-Palestinian dispute, and recommends sweeping changes for reforming international institutions, including the United Nations Security Council.
Power, Terror, Peace, and War is a clear, concise guide to some of the most pressing issues before us, today and for the foreseeable future.
FROM THE CRITICS
David Frum - The New York Times
For those who support the president and his policies, Power, Terror, Peace, and War is interesting not only in itself but also as evidence of how dramatically Bush has transformed the American foreign policy debate. For those who do not support the president, this book is a sharp reminder that, in Mead's words, opponents have ''not yet managed to present a cogent and convincing alternative strategy.''
Publishers Weekly
Mead, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and author of Special Providence, proposes a new strategic paradigm based on the premise that an unfettered global capitalism and a more aggressive American imperium are inevitable. Sometimes his terminology only muddles the conventional wisdom: for instance, he labels the neoconservatives' moralistic, interventionist foreign policy "Revival Wilsonianism," even though it rejects traditional Wilsonians' defining belief in binding international institutions. And he identifies Islamist militancy as "Arabian fascism," even though the movement advocates religious rather than ethnic solidarity. In other cases, Mead provides a useful framework, such as his contrast between the (Henry) "Fordist" bureaucratic welfare state of the 20th century and the new century's individualistic "millennial capitalism," whose roots he traces to a "Jacksonian" rebellion against the professional class that administered post-New Deal American society. Also valuable is Mead's refinement of Joseph Nye's distinction between soft and hard power. Hard power, Mead says, ought to be further divided between "sharp" (military) and "sticky" (economic) power, while soft power comprises "sweet" (cultural) and "hegemonic" (the totality of America's agenda-setting power). These concepts help shape Mead's approach to the Bush doctrine. He supports its most controversial elements, unilateralism and pre-emptive war, but urges greater attention to the sticky, sweet and hegemonic aspects of American influence in the next stage of the war on terror. Mead's book demonstrates the value and difficulty of analyzing the "architecture of America's world policy" from such heights of abstraction before hindsight has clarified what is historically determined and what is contingent. Agent, Geri Thoma. (Apr. 28) Copyright 2004 Reed Business Information.
Library Journal
Henry A. Kissinger Fellow in U.S. Foreign Policy at the Council on Foreign Relations, Mead argues that Bush has shifted traditional U.S. policy patterns-with divisive results. Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information.
Kirkus Reviews
Yes, Virginia, America does aspire to rule the world. So says Council on Foreign Relations stalwart Mead (Special Providence, 2001, etc.), who writes, "There is an American project-a grand strategic vision of what it is that the United States seeks to build in the world." And what is that? Briefly put, a world order that shares our values and a shield to protect our domestic security. There's nothing particularly wrong with those aims, Mead writes, but American efforts are misguided in their application, which tends to be incoherent, unstudied, and ineffectual. (Think faulty intelligence over Iraq. Think bin Laden at large.) We can do better, Mead argues, on the hearts-and-minds front, though he has no problem with the thought of striking fear in the hearts of recalcitrants; what is wanted is to strike a balance between the use of too little or too much power, military and economic. Will it work? Well, Mead notes, there are some powerful demographic and social forces at work that are going to make America's future in the world very interesting. Abroad is the growing spread of what he memorably calls "Arabian fascism." In sad old Europe, there's hatred for American-sponsored "millennial capitalism," which is unknotting the old social safety nets. And at home, a growing fundamentalist Protestant population with increasingly great political power is inclined to see fascist Arabia and secular Europe as threats to its perceived view of how a well-run Christian American world ought to look. A glum outlook all around, though Mead harbors hope for a brighter future (without the Bush administration, apparently) in which First World wealth can be put to work doing social good in the Third World,"enabling people around the world to change their lives by the power of capital."Part pessimism, part pipe-dream: overall, an interesting exercise in geopolitical description-and prescription. First printing of 35,000. Agent: Elaine Markson/Elaine Markson Agency