The New Face of War: How War will be Fought in the 21st Century FROM THE PUBLISHER
As American and coalition troops fight the first battles of this new century -- from Afghanistan to Yemen to the Philippines to Iraq -- they do so in ways never before seen. Until recently, information war was but one piece of a puzzle, more than a sideshow in war but far less than the sum total of the game. Today, however, we find information war revolutionizing combat, from top to bottom. Gone are the advantages of fortified positions -- nothing is impregnable any longer. Gone is the reason to create an overwhelming mass of troops -- now, troop concentrations merely present easier targets. Instead, stealth, swarming, and "zapping" (precision strikes on individuals or equipment) are the order of the day, based on superior information and lightning-fast decision-making. In many ways, modern warfare is information warfare.
Bruce Berkowitz's explanation of how information war revolutionized combat and what it means for our soldiers could not be better timed. As Western forces wage war against terrorists and their supporters, in actions large and small, on several continents, The New Face of War explains how they fight and how they will win or lose. There are four key dynamics to the new warfare: asymmetric threats, in which even the strongest armies may suffer from at least one Achilles' heel; information-technology competition, in which advantages in computers and communications are crucial; the race of decision cycles, in which the first opponent to process and react to information effectively is almost certain to win; and network organization, in which fluid arrays of combat forces can spontaneously organize in multiple ways to fight any given opponent at any time.
America's use of networked, elite ground forces, in combination with precision-guided bombing from manned and unmanned flyers, turned Afghanistan from a Soviet graveyard into a lopsided field of American victory. Yet we are not invulnerable, and the same technology that we used in Kuwait in 1991 is now available to anyone with a credit card and access to the Internet. Al Qaeda is adept in the new model of war, and has searched long and hard for weaknesses in our defenses. Will we be able to stay ahead of its thinking? In Iraq, Saddam's army is in no position to defeat its enemies -- but could it defend Baghdad? As the world anxiously considers these and other questions of modern war, Bruce Berkowitz offers many answers and a framework for understanding combat that will never again resemble the days of massive marches on fortress-like positions. The New Face of War is a crucial guidebook for reading the headlines from across our troubled planet.
SYNOPSIS
Articulating a view that is increasingly common in the hallways of the Pentagon, if not in the streets of Baghdad or the mountains of the Afghan-Pakistan border region, Berkowitz (of the Hoover Institution at Stanford U.) argues that information technology has become the most important aspect of warfare and the deciding factor in military outcomes. Writing for a general audience, he explains how communication networks, global positioning satellites, rates-of-decision cycles, small special operations teams, and "cyberwar" are expected by some military thinkers to be important facets of military conflict in the present and near future. Annotation ©2004 Book News, Inc., Portland, OR
FROM THE CRITICS
The New York Times
On 9/11, phone calls in and out of Manhattan were often impossible. This was a part of Al Qaeda's war. As Bruce Berkowitz argues in The New Face of War: ''The Information Revolution has fundamentally changed the nature of combat. To win wars today, you must first win the information war.'' Since the time of the ancient Persians and Romans, armies have been basically lumbering forces. At least since the end of World War II, and especially since the Persian Gulf war in 1991, American military success, Berkowitz argues, has rested on superior military technology: precision-guided munitions, stealthy planes invisible to radar, satellites, even robotics. — Gary J. Bass
The Washington Post
Berkowitz does not set out to systematically defend this thesis, which is sure to be resisted by some traditional "ground pounders," as infantry forces are colloquially called in the U.S. military. But most readers likely will be convinced by the strong second chapter of The New Face of War. Titled simply "An Afghan Hard Drive," it describes how the war on terrorism is really a battle for information dominance pitting the United States against al Qaeda. America's foes may be fanatics, but they're not primitive; they make cunning use of laptops, the Internet and cell phones to coordinate their attacks. Berkowitz shows how the terrorist network is organized into autonomous cells "linked together by a secure, networked communications systems." America paid a heavy price on Sept. 11 because it failed to penetrate this global network. — Max Boot
Foreign Affairs
This is yet another book on the future of war, examining how it might be fought rather than by whom and for what. In this version, both the United States and its enemies operate on a global scale using decentralized units, each exploiting information technology to sustain communications and get ahead of the other's decision-making. The style is rather jaunty, but there is real value in Berkowitz's ability to identify many prominent concepts that influence current thinking. He refers to key figures and the strategic debates in which they were engaged, often stretching back into the Cold War, showing their interaction with emerging technologies and institutional structures. For example, he details how John Boyd conceived of the observation, orientation, decision, action (ooda) loop, why Andrew Marshall began to focus on asymmetries, even when dealing with the Soviet Union, and how David Ronfeldt and John Arquilla hit upon the idea of cyber-warfare and networked armies. This contributes to our understanding of the development of strategic thought. There is an effective demolition of the notion that attacks on information systems alone, however strategic, can ever be sufficient. Berkowitz shows sympathy for those attempting to push innovative projects through large bureaucracies.1