A Non-Random Walk Down Wall Street FROM THE PUBLISHER
For over half a century, financial experts have regarded the movements of markets as a random walk -- unpredictable meanderings akin to a drunkard's unsteady gait -- and this hypothesis has become a cornerstone of modern financial economics and many investment strategies. Here, Andrew W. Lo and A. Craig MacKinlay put the Random Walk Hypothesis to the test. In this volume, which elegantly integrates their most important articles, Lo and MacKinlay find that markets are not completely random after all, and that predictable components do exist in recent stock and bond returns. Their book provides a state-of-the-art account of the techniques for detecting predictabilities and evaluating their statistical and economic significance, and offers a tantalizing glimpse into the financial technologies of the future.
FROM THE CRITICS
Peter Coy - Business Week
But markets don't know everything, say the authors of A Non-Random Walk Down Wall Street. People who devote enough time, money, and brain power can beat the market by finding undervalued companies or discovering persistent price patterns, say Lo and MacKinlay. Their profits are "simply the fair reward to breakthroughs in financial technology," they argue.
Constance Loizos - Investment News
Here's an interesting case for actively managed mutual funds over index funds. Performance numbers for the active managers would be a lot better if you looked only at nimbler new funds and left out the bloated old ones that are the real underperformers. "Active funds that have been more recently invested outperform in a significant way the active funds that were long ago invested," Wharton School Professor A. Craig MacKinlay observed during the Investment Management Consultants Association conference in San Francisco late last month.
WHAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING
Michael Brennan, University of California, Los Angeles
This provocative collection of essays provides careful empirical analyses of the major anomalies that have appeared in financial markets in the thirty-five years since Paul Cootner's influential Random Character of Stock Market Prices. It provides convincing evidence against the random walk as applied to stock markets, and at the same time warns us of the dangers of finding spurious anomalies. It is a worthy successor to Cootneris classic. Princeton University Press