Privacy on the Line: The Politics of Wiretapping and Encryption FROM THE PUBLISHER
Telecommunication has never been perfectly secure, as the Cold War culture of wiretaps and international spying taught us. Yet many of us still take our privacy for granted, even as we become more reliant than ever on telephones, computer networks, and electronic transactions of all kinds. So many of our relationships now use telecommunication as the primary mode of communication that the security of these transactions has become a source of wide public concern and debate. Whitfield Diffie and Susan Landau argue that if we are to retain the privacy that characterized face-to-face relationships in the past, we must build the means of protecting that privacy into our communication systems. Diffie and Landau examine the national-security, law-enforcement, commercial, and civil-liberties issues. They discuss privacy's social function, how it underlies a democratic society, and what happens when it is lost. They also explore how intelligence and law-enforcement organizations work, how they intercept communications, and how they use what they intercept.
FROM THE CRITICS
Publishers Weekly
Comsec, sigint, NSA, NIST, DES, Clipper chip, key escrowsuch technobabble related to intelligence-gathering can baffle the uninitiated. This authoritative treatise helps unveil some of the mystery and puts contemporary freedom, privacy and security issues in perspective. After explaining basic concepts of cryptography, the authors cover the history of 20th-century intelligence gathering, then recount the long, discouraging saga of the U.S. government's invasions of its citizens' privacy. In World War II, census data were used illegally to round up Japanese Americans. In the 1950s and '60s, the CIA read private mail, and in the 1970s, it monitored research requests in public libraries. The electronic spying of our security agencies is not even a law-enforcement bargainwiretapping is costly and produces arguably modest results. Issues of the 1990s include the 1992 Digital Telephone Proposal, the legal vicissitudes of "Pretty Good Privacy," and the government's attempts to require key escrow (storage of keys so that the government can crack coded messages). As in earlier times, we still see competition between the various security bureaucracies. Diffie is a distinguished engineer at Sun Microsystems and the inventor of public-key cryptography (software that encodes a document with one key and deciphers it with another); Landau is a research associate professor in the department of computer science at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Together, they bring formidable expertise to bear on complex topics. (Feb.)
Library Journal
Respected cryptographer Diffie and noted computer scientist Landau here examine a range of telecommunication issues ranging from individual privacy to national security. They begin with a chapter on the basics of cryptography, a system of writing messages in secured form using codes and ciphers and then move on to discuss issues of public policy, law enforcement, and civil liberties as they relate to modern communications systems. Following an enlightening discussion on wiretapping practices that describes how messages are intercepted and how agencies use the information they intercept, Diffie and Landau show why intelligence and law-enforcement agencies view cryptography in communications as a threat to their existence. They analyze the sociology of privacy, how it forms the underpinnings of a democratic society, and what happens when it is lost. The authors conclude by arguing that if we are to retain privacy in communicating with each other, we must build the means of protecting that privacy into our present communication systems. A call to arms for removing restrictions to such secure communications systems, this is an important and timely work for most libraries.Joe J. Accardi, Northeastern Illinois Univ. Lib., Chicago
Kenneth W. Dam
A remarkable blend of technical expertise, historical analysis, and provocative policy argument. This is an indispensable book for anyone hoping to get to the bottom of the disputes over cryptography, computer security, privacy, and wiretapping that currently divide the law enforcement, civil liberties, and high tech communities. -- Kenneth W. Dam, University of Chicago
Lawrence E. Rothstein - The Law and Politics Book Review
The wealth of information provided, both in the text and the notes, on the regulations, laws and jurisprudence dealing with encryption, wiretapping and privacy make this an important reference book....I found many enlightening
anecdotes and behind-the-scenes references with which I was not familiar....Overall this is a well-researched and fascinating study.
WHAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING
Joe J. Accardi, Northeastern Illinois University Library, Chicago, in Library Journal
Respected cryptographer Diffie and noted computer scientist Landau here examine a range of telecommunication issues ranging from individual privacy to national security. They begin with a chapter on the basics of cryptography, a system of writing messages in secured form using codes and ciphers and then move on to discuss issues of public policy, law enforcement, and civil liberties as they relate to modern communications systems.
Following an enlightening discussion on wiretapping practices that describes how messages are intercepted and how agencies use the information they intercept, Diffie and Landau show why intelligence and law-enforcement agencies view cryptography in communications as a threat to their existence. They analyze the sociology of privacy, how it forms the underpinnings of a democratic society, and what happens when it is lost. The authors conclude by arguing that if we are to retain privacy in communicating with each other, we must build the means of protecting that privacy into our present communication systems.
A call to arms for removing restrictions to such secure communications systems, this is an important and timely work for most libraries. Joe J. Accardi
The issue of encryption use by private citizens was pushed into the public eye after Phil Zimmerman was placed under threat of indictment resulting from the release of Pretty Good Privacy(PGP). The indictment threat was withdrawn and the public stopped paying much attention to it. It was replaced by the threat of the Computer Decency Act (CDA) as the focus of attention. Now that threat has been pushed back, so the focus seems to be somewhat diffused. The underlying problem has not received the attention it deserves. These two events (and a few others) are merely instances of the most serious threat to the American way of life since the Civil War. The threat is to our right to privacy in our communications with one another. The right to privacy is not mentioned explicitly in the Constitution, but it falls within the penumbra (shadow) of the rights that are explicit.... Robert Bruen