Search for books and compare prices on all major online booksellers with one click!

Home  About UsSuggest BookstoreRecommend Us 
    Title/Keywords ISBN  

Debating the Death Penalty: Should America Have Capital Punishment? the Experts on Both Sides Make Their Best Case

AUTHOR: Hugo Adam Adam Bedau (Editor)
ISBN: 0195169832

SHORT DESCRIPTION: This volume brings together seven experts--judges, lawyers, prosecutors, and philosophers--to debate the death penalty in a spirit of open inquiry and civil discussion. Here, as the contributors present their reasons for or against capital...

Compare Price


HOME--->> Professional & Technology --->>Law --->>Criminal Law
 
Criminal Law
         Editorial Review

Debating the Death Penalty: Should America Have Capital Punishment? the Experts on Both Sides Make Their Best Case
- Book Review,
by Hugo Adam Adam Bedau (Editor)


From Booklist
From the commuting of death sentences to life imprisonment and the pardoning of four death-row prisoners last year by then Illinois governor George Ryan, the death penalty has now come front and center in American consciousness. This collection of essays presents a balanced discussion of the range of issues associated with this debate, including the speech delivered by Ryan when he made his historic decision. The essayists include federal judges, lawyers, and philosophers. Four of the essays argue for the death penalty and four against. Contributors examine the key areas concerning the death penalty: race and economics, the U.S. position on capital punishment in contrast to that of other nations, retribution and morality, the risks of wrongful convictions, the deterrence value of capital punishment, and closure for victims' families. Contributors emphasize their own particular points of view but add to an excellent overview of this life-and-death issue. Vernon Ford
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved


Book Description
When news breaks that a convicted murderer, released from prison, has killed again, or that an innocent person has escaped the death chamber in light of new DNA evidence, arguments about capital punishment inevitably heat up. Few controversies continue to stir as much emotion as this one, and public confusion is often the result. This volume brings together seven experts--judges, lawyers, prosecutors, and philosophers--to debate the death penalty in a spirit of open inquiry and civil discussion. Here, as the contributors present their reasons for or against capital punishment, the multiple facets of the issue are revealed in clear and thought-provoking detail. Is the death penalty a viable deterrent to future crimes? Does the imposition of lesser penalties, such as life imprisonment, truly serve justice in cases of the worst offences? Does the legal system discriminate against poor or minority defendants? Is the possibility of executing innocent persons sufficient grounds for abolition? In confronting such questions and making their arguments, the contributors marshal an impressive array of evidence, both statistical and from their own experiences working on death penalty cases. The book also includes the text of Governor George Ryan's March 2002 speech in which he explained why he had commuted the sentences of all prisoners on Illinois's death row. By representing the viewpoints of experts who face the vexing questions about capital punishment on a daily basis, Debating the Death Penalty makes a vital contribution to a more nuanced understanding of the moral and legal problems underlying this controversy.


Buy from Amazon     Compare Prices



         Book Review

Debating the Death Penalty: Should America Have Capital Punishment? the Experts on Both Sides Make Their Best Case
- Book Reviews,
by Hugo Adam Adam Bedau (Editor)

Debating the Death Penalty: Should America Have Capital Punishment? the Experts on Both Sides Make Their Best Case

FROM THE PUBLISHER

When news breaks that a convicted murderer, released from prison, has killed again, or that an innocent person has escaped the death chamber in light of new DNA evidence, arguments about capital punishment inevitably heat up. Few controversies continue to stir as much emotion as this one, and public confusion is often the result. This volume brings together seven experts -- judges, lawyers, prosecutors, and philosophers -- to debate the death penalty in a spirit of open inquiry and civil discussion. Here, as the contributors present their reasons for or against capital punishment, the multiple facets of the issue are revealed in clear and thought-provoking detail. Is the death penalty a viable deterrent to future crimes? Does the imposition of lesser penalties, such as life imprisonment, truly serve justice in cases of the worst offences? Does the legal system discriminate against poor or minority defendants? Is the possibility of executing innocent persons sufficient grounds for abolition? In confronting such questions and making their arguments, the contributors marshal an impressive array of evidence, both statistical and from their own experiences working on death penalty cases. The book also includes the text of Governor George Ryan's March 2002 speech in which Ryan explained why he had commuted the sentences of all prisoners on Illinois's death row. By representing the viewpoints of experts who face the vexing questions about capital punishment on a daily basis, Debating the Death Penalty makes a vital contribution to a more nuanced understanding of the moral and legal problems underlying this controversy.


Buy from Barnes & Noble     Compare Prices




HOME  |  Recommend bookstore  |  Rate bookstore  |  Link to us  |  Report bug  |  Contact us
Copyright© 2003 - 2005, PowerBookSearch.com. All Rights Reserved.